1959 Humber Super Snipe vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1965 Triumph 2000 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Humber Super Snipe (121 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Humber Super Snipe should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 322 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1959 Humber Super Snipe (220 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1959 Humber Super Snipe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Humber Super Snipe | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Humber | Triumph |
Model | Super Snipe | 2000 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 121 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 76 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1492 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2700 mm |