1959 Humber Super Snipe vs. 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 12 kg more than 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Humber Super Snipe | 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Humber | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Super Snipe | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 121 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1492 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2760 mm |
