1959 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 322 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Humber Super Snipe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Humber Super Snipe | 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
Make | Humber | Mitsubishi |
Model | Super Snipe | Dingo |
Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 121 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1492 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2450 mm |