1959 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1959 Humber Super Snipe. (121 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1959 Humber Super Snipe.
Because 1959 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Humber Super Snipe. (220 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Humber Super Snipe.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Humber Super Snipe | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Humber | Holden |
Model | Super Snipe | Epica |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 121 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 220 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2700 mm |