1959 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2011 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2011 Dodge Dakota is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Dodge Dakota (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1959 Humber Super Snipe. (121 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1959 Humber Super Snipe.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Dodge Dakota (236 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Humber Super Snipe. (220 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2011 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Humber Super Snipe.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Humber Super Snipe | 2011 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Humber | Dodge |
Model | Super Snipe | Dakota |
Year Released | 1959 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 121 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 87.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 100 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3340 mm |