1959 Isuzu Minx vs. 1997 Suzuki C2

To start off, 1997 Suzuki C2 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Suzuki C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1959 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 1959 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 182 kg more than 1997 Suzuki C2.

Because 1959 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1997 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Isuzu Minx.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Isuzu Minx 1997 Suzuki C2
Make Isuzu Suzuki
Model Minx C2
Year Released 1959 1997
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1489 cc 1600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 62 HP 251 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 112 Nm 284 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1030 kg 848 kg
Vehicle Length 4120 mm 3660 mm
Vehicle Width 1550 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1520 mm 1230 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2240 mm