1959 Isuzu Minx vs. 2002 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2002 Skoda Fabia is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Skoda Fabia (74 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1959 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Fabia should accelerate faster than 1959 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Skoda Fabia weights approximately 44 kg more than 1959 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Fabia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Skoda Fabia (126 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2002 Skoda Fabia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Isuzu Minx. 2002 Skoda Fabia has automatic transmission and 1959 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1959 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Skoda Fabia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Isuzu Minx | 2002 Skoda Fabia | |
Make | Isuzu | Skoda |
Model | Minx | Fabia |
Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 75.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1074 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2470 mm |