1959 Isuzu Minx vs. 2004 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1959 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1959 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 684 kg more than 1959 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Isuzu Minx | 2004 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Isuzu | Jaguar |
Model | Minx | XK |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 294 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 411 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1714 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2590 mm |