1959 Isuzu Minx vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-5 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-5 (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1959 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-5 should accelerate faster than 1959 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-5 weights approximately 458 kg more than 1959 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-5 (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda CX-5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Isuzu Minx. 2013 Mazda CX-5 has automatic transmission and 1959 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1959 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Mazda CX-5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Isuzu Minx | 2013 Mazda CX-5 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | Minx | CX-5 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 91 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1488 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4555 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2165 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2700 mm |
