1959 Jaguar MK II vs. 2003 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2003 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Jaguar MK II (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2003 Volkswagen Polo. (101 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Jaguar MK II should accelerate faster than 2003 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Jaguar MK II weights approximately 370 kg more than 2003 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1959 Jaguar MK II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Jaguar MK II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jaguar MK II (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Volkswagen Polo. (126 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1959 Jaguar MK II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Volkswagen Polo.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Jaguar MK II 2003 Volkswagen Polo
Make Jaguar Volkswagen
Model MK II Polo
Year Released 1959 2003
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2483 cc 1390 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 120 HP 101 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 195 Nm 126 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 76.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.5 mm 75.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.0:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1476 kg 1106 kg
Vehicle Length 4600 mm 3910 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1530 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2590 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 54 L 45 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]