1959 Jaguar XK vs. 1952 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1959 Jaguar XK is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Jaguar XK (251 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1952 Maserati A6G. (101 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1952 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Jaguar XK weights approximately 373 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Jaguar XK | 1952 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Jaguar | Maserati |
| Model | XK | A6G |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3442 cc | 1954 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1473 kg | 1100 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2560 mm |
