1959 Jaguar XK vs. 1952 MG YB
To start off, 1959 Jaguar XK is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 MG YB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 MG YB would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Jaguar XK (220 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1952 MG YB. (45 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1952 MG YB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Jaguar XK weights approximately 370 kg more than 1952 MG YB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jaguar XK (325 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 MG YB. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1959 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 MG YB.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Jaguar XK | 1952 MG YB | |
Make | Jaguar | MG |
Model | XK | YB |
Year Released | 1959 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 1250 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 79 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2520 mm |