1959 Jaguar XK vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1966 Triumph 2000 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Jaguar XK (220 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Jaguar XK weights approximately 260 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jaguar XK (325 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1959 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Jaguar XK | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Jaguar | Triumph |
Model | XK | 2000 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2700 mm |