1959 Jaguar XK vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Jaguar XK (251 HP) has 198 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Jaguar XK weights approximately 823 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Jaguar XK | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Jaguar | MCC |
| Model | XK | Smart |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3442 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 53 HP |
| Top Speed | 212 km/hour | 129 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1473 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1460 mm |
