1959 Jaguar XK vs. 2001 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2001 Smart ForTwo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Jaguar XK (265 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 2001 Smart ForTwo. (74 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2001 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Jaguar XK weights approximately 653 kg more than 2001 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Jaguar XK | 2001 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Jaguar | Smart |
Model | XK | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1959 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1473 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 1820 mm |