1959 Jaguar XK vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Jaguar XK (220 HP) has 111 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1959 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Jaguar XK | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | XK | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 109 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2490 mm |