1959 Jaguar XK vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Jaguar XK (265 HP) has 112 more horse power than 2006 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Epica.
Because 1959 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jaguar XK (353 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1959 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Jaguar XK | 2006 Holden Epica | |
Make | Jaguar | Holden |
Model | XK | Epica |
Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 353 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2700 mm |