1959 Jaguar XK vs. 2008 Land Rover Defender
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Defender is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Defender weights approximately 644 kg more than 1959 Jaguar XK.
Because 2008 Land Rover Defender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Defender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jaguar XK (353 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Land Rover Defender. (301 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 1959 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Land Rover Defender.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Jaguar XK | 2008 Land Rover Defender | |
Make | Jaguar | Land Rover |
Model | XK | Defender |
Year Released | 1959 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 2495 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 353 Nm | 301 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 89 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1473 kg | 2117 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3230 mm |