1959 Jaguar XK vs. 2011 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2011 Dodge Ram is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Jaguar XK (265 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2011 Dodge Ram. (212 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2011 Dodge Ram.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jaguar XK (353 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Dodge Ram. (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1959 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Jaguar XK | 2011 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Jaguar | Dodge |
Model | XK | Ram |
Year Released | 1959 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 88.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2900 mm |