1959 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1991 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1991 Lotus Elan is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1959 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1959 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 33 kg more than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Because 1959 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Lotus Elan. (143 Nm). This means 1959 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Jeep CJ5 | 1991 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Jeep | Lotus |
| Model | CJ5 | Elan |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1991 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 160 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 143 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 997 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2260 mm |
