1959 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,931 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 145 more horse power than 1959 Jeep CJ5. (135 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1959 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 531 kg more than 1959 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Lincoln LS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Jeep CJ5. (325 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Jeep CJ5 | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Jeep | Lincoln |
Model | CJ5 | LS |
Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 3931 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 280 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 388 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1711 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3030 mm |