1959 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2005 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Jeep CJ5 (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2005 Suzuki Reno. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 2005 Suzuki Reno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 82 kg more than 1959 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1959 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Suzuki Reno. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jeep CJ5 (325 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki Reno. (178 Nm). This means 1959 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki Reno.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Jeep CJ5 | 2005 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | CJ5 | Reno |
Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1262 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2610 mm |