1959 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2006 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2006 Mazda B3000 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda B3000 (154 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1959 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 1959 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 380 kg more than 1959 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda B3000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda B3000 (244 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Jeep CJ5 | 2006 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ5 | B3000 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 244 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3200 mm |