1959 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix

To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Jeep CJ5 (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 175 kg more than 1959 Jeep CJ5.

Because 1959 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jeep CJ5 (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (165 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1959 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Matrix.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Jeep CJ5 2006 Toyota Matrix
Make Jeep Toyota
Model CJ5 Matrix
Year Released 1959 2006
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3687 cc 1786 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 135 HP 126 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 325 Nm 165 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4200 RPM
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1180 kg 1355 kg
Vehicle Length 3520 mm 4360 mm
Vehicle Width 1550 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1740 mm 1570 mm
Wheelbase Size 2060 mm 2610 mm