1959 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1959 Jeep CJ5. (135 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1959 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1959 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Cruze. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jeep CJ5 (325 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 1959 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Jeep CJ5 | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Jeep | Holden |
| Model | CJ5 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2685 mm |
