1959 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (380 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 318 more horse power than 1959 Jeep CJ5. (62 HP @ 3000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1959 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 690 kg more than 1959 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XJ (450 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Jeep CJ5. (180 Nm @ 1350 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Jeep CJ5 | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Jeep | Jaguar |
Model | CJ5 | XJ |
Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3153 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 380 HP |
Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1350 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 5252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2105 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3157 mm |