1959 Lincoln Continental vs. 1974 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1974 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,043 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Lincoln Continental (349 HP) has 230 more horse power than 1974 Mazda RX-2. (119 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1263 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Lincoln Continental | 1974 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Lincoln | Mazda |
| Model | Continental | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7043 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 349 HP | 119 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2223 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5770 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2480 mm |
