1959 Lincoln Continental vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,043 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Lincoln Continental (349 HP) has 243 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1153 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1959 Lincoln Continental has automatic transmission and 2006 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2006 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Lincoln Continental will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Lincoln Continental | 2006 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Lincoln | Renault |
| Model | Continental | Clio |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7043 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 349 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Top Speed | 174 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2223 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5770 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2480 mm |
