1959 Lincoln Continental vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,043 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Lincoln Continental (349 HP) has 116 more horse power than 2013 Toyota Tundra. (233 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2013 Toyota Tundra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 146 kg more than 2013 Toyota Tundra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Lincoln Continental | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Lincoln | Toyota |
| Model | Continental | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7043 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 349 HP | 233 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 95 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2223 kg | 2077 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5770 mm | 5329 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1935 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 3221 mm |
