1959 Lotus Seven vs. 1952 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1959 Lotus Seven is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 1,247 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Triumph Mayflower is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Lotus Seven (74 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Lotus Seven should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Mayflower. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Triumph Mayflower weights approximately 530 kg more than 1959 Lotus Seven.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Lotus Seven | 1952 Triumph Mayflower | |
Make | Lotus | Triumph |
Model | Seven | Mayflower |
Year Released | 1959 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 420 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2140 mm |