1959 Lotus Seven vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,171 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Lotus Seven is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (73 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1959 Lotus Seven. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1959 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 520 kg more than 1959 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Lotus Seven | 2003 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Lotus | MCC |
| Model | Seven | Smart |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1171 cc | 1124 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 73 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 445 kg | 965 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2510 mm |
