1959 Lotus Seven vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 117 more horse power than 1959 Lotus Seven. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1959 Lotus Seven.
Because 1959 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1959 Lotus Seven has manual transmission. 1959 Lotus Seven will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Lotus Seven | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Lotus | Holden |
Model | Seven | Epica |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 947 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2700 mm |