1959 Marcos GT vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Marcos GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Marcos GT would be higher. At 3,965 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1959 Marcos GT. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1959 Marcos GT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1505 kg more than 1959 Marcos GT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Marcos GT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Marcos GT | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Marcos | Jeep |
| Model | GT | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 3965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 195 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 394 kg | 1899 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2700 mm |
