1959 Marcos GT vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Marcos GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Marcos GT would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (97 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1959 Marcos GT. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1959 Marcos GT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 636 kg more than 1959 Marcos GT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Marcos GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Marcos GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Marcos GT | 2006 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Marcos | Renault |
| Model | GT | Clio |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 97 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 394 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2690 mm |
