1959 Maserati 250 vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Maserati 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Maserati 250 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1959 Maserati 250. (232 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1959 Maserati 250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 669 kg more than 1959 Maserati 250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1959 Maserati 250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Maserati 250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1959 Maserati 250 has manual transmission. 1959 Maserati 250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: