1959 Maserati Tipo 60 vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Maserati Tipo 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Maserati Tipo 60 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Maserati Tipo 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Maserati Tipo 60 (198 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (106 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Maserati Tipo 60 should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 500 kg more than 1959 Maserati Tipo 60.
Because 1959 Maserati Tipo 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Maserati Tipo 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Maserati Tipo 60 | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Maserati | Renault |
Model | Tipo 60 | Clio |
Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 1070 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2480 mm |