1959 Mercedes-Benz 220 vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 2,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Mercedes-Benz 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Mercedes-Benz 220 (115 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Mercedes-Benz 220 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1959 Mercedes-Benz 220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Mercedes-Benz 220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Mercedes-Benz 220 | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
| Model | 220 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2195 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 67 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2490 mm |
