1959 Mercedes-Benz SC vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC would be higher. At 2,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC.
Because 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Mercedes-Benz SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Mercedes-Benz SC | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
Model | SC | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2195 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2490 mm |