1959 Mercedes-Benz W 111 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Mercedes-Benz W 111. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Mercedes-Benz W 111 would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche (316 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1959 Mercedes-Benz W 111. (94 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 1959 Mercedes-Benz W 111. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche weights approximately 1239 kg more than 1959 Mercedes-Benz W 111. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche (454 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Mercedes-Benz W 111. (169 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Mercedes-Benz W 111.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Mercedes-Benz W 111 | 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Chevrolet |
Model | W 111 | Avalanche |
Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2195 cc | 5328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 316 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 454 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.7 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 2559 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 5621 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1946 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3302 mm |