1959 Mitsubishi A10 vs. 1963 Renault 4
To start off, 1963 Renault 4 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Mitsubishi A10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Mitsubishi A10 would be higher. At 747 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Renault 4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Renault 4 (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1959 Mitsubishi A10. (20 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Renault 4 should accelerate faster than 1959 Mitsubishi A10. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Renault 4 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1959 Mitsubishi A10. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Mitsubishi A10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Mitsubishi A10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Mitsubishi A10 | 1963 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | A10 | 4 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 493 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 20 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 475 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3150 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2070 mm | 2410 mm |
