1959 Morris Minor vs. 1991 Renault Clio

To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Morris Minor would be higher. At 1,170 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Renault Clio (59 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1959 Morris Minor. (36 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1959 Morris Minor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Renault Clio weights approximately 65 kg more than 1959 Morris Minor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1959 Morris Minor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Morris Minor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Renault Clio (88 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Morris Minor. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1991 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Morris Minor.

Compare all specifications: