1959 Nissan 211 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Nissan 211. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Nissan 211 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (212 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1959 Nissan 211. (34 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1959 Nissan 211. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 695 kg more than 1959 Nissan 211. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (262 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Nissan 211. (66 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Nissan 211.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Nissan 211 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
Model | 211 | CTS |
Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 988 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 66 Nm | 262 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2890 mm |