1959 Opel Rekord vs. 2003 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2003 Seat Arosa is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 1,680 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Opel Rekord is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Opel Rekord weights approximately 65 kg more than 2003 Seat Arosa.
Because 1959 Opel Rekord is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Opel Rekord. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Opel Rekord | 2003 Seat Arosa | |
| Make | Opel | Seat |
| Model | Rekord | Arosa |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1680 cc | 998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 49 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1650 mm |
