1959 Renault Dauphine vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Renault Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Renault Dauphine would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 105 more horse power than 1959 Renault Dauphine. (33 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1959 Renault Dauphine.
Because 1959 Renault Dauphine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Renault Dauphine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (148 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Renault Dauphine. (45 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Renault Dauphine.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Renault Dauphine | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Renault | Holden |
| Model | Dauphine | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 845 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2685 mm |
