1959 Renault Juva vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 1996 Rover 400 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 400 weights approximately 440 kg more than 1959 Renault Juva.
Because 1959 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Renault Juva | 1996 Rover 400 | |
Make | Renault | Rover |
Model | Juva | 400 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 845 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2630 mm |