1959 Renault Juva vs. 1996 Subaru Vivio
To start off, 1996 Subaru Vivio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Renault Juva would be higher. At 845 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Renault Juva is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Renault Juva weights approximately 130 kg more than 1996 Subaru Vivio.
Because 1959 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Vivio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Renault Juva | 1996 Subaru Vivio | |
| Make | Renault | Subaru |
| Model | Juva | Vivio |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
| Engine Size | 845 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 43 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2320 mm |
