1959 Renault Juva vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1959 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Renault Juva | 2011 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Renault | Holden |
| Model | Juva | Epica |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Size | 845 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2700 mm |
