1959 Renault Juva vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Honda CR-Z is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 422 kg more than 1959 Renault Juva.
Because 1959 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Renault Juva | 2011 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Renault | Honda |
| Model | Juva | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 845 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 1202 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2436 mm |
