1959 Riley Two Point Six vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Riley Two Point Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Riley Two Point Six would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Riley Two Point Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1959 Riley Two Point Six. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1959 Riley Two Point Six.
Because 1959 Riley Two Point Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Riley Two Point Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Riley Two Point Six. (183 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Riley Two Point Six.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Riley Two Point Six | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Riley | Holden |
Model | Two Point Six | Epica |
Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 183 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2700 mm |