1959 Riley Two Point Six vs. 2012 Volvo S60
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Riley Two Point Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Riley Two Point Six would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Riley Two Point Six is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Riley Two Point Six weights approximately 31 kg more than 2012 Volvo S60.
Because 1959 Riley Two Point Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Riley Two Point Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo S60 (240 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Riley Two Point Six. (183 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Riley Two Point Six.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Riley Two Point Six | 2012 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Riley | Volvo |
Model | Two Point Six | S60 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 183 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2776 mm |